Eb's Blog
sebling
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit sebling's Xanga Site!

Name: Steve
Country: United States
State: Wisconsin
Metro: Milwaukee
Birthday: 5/10/1954
Gender: Male


Interests: Theology, reading, surfing the 'net, Law and Order, 24, old movies, teaching from the Word, my wife and kids, biking (not necessarily in order!)
Expertise: I can get a good night's sleep most of the time. Does that count?
Occupation: Computer related
Industry: Banking/Finance


Message: message meEmail: email me


Member Since: 12/31/2003

SubscriptionsSites I Read
thefightingfor
godrulzu2

Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Thursday, November 22, 2007

My response to Jim Wallis' response to a Muslim Call for Common Ground

My response to Jim Wallis' response to a Muslim Call for Common Ground http://blog.beliefnet.com/godspolitics/2007/11/my-response-to-a-muslim-call-f.html

Elaine raises very important questions and points. No where in the teachings of Christ can be found justification for the things of which "Loving God and Neighbor Together" rightfully apologized.
I find no similar apology in "A Common Word Between Us and You" for violence done in the name of Islam for to apologize for such violence would be to deny the Quranic commands to smite the necks of the unbelievers they meet in battle (47:4) and to kill them wherever you find them (2:191), et al.
Nor is there apology for the practice of dhimmitude which is the Islamic version of "mercy" for the survivors among the conquered who agree to submit but not convert.
Christians and Muslims do not worship the same God, for the God of the Christians is "the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ" (Eph 1:3) while Islam denies the deity of Christ.
Let us have dialog on how we can we can live together, but let us not deny the fundamental differences between Christianity and Islam.
I fully expect that this post will be severely edited (as have other of my posts to the point of making them appear to be in agreement) or eliminated.


Sunday, September 30, 2007

 

We got into a discussion in a Sunday School class that touched on the death penalty. I raised the question as to whether it was biblical to continue to support a practice that is inequitably applied in this country. Go and ahead and tell me I'm getting soft headed in my dotage. Tell me I listen to NPR too much and read the wrong books. Whatever...

 

While the discussion centered on the race issue, government statistics show that there are more whites on death row than blacks and that more whites have been executed than blacks in recent years.

Amnesty International has this to say:

“As long as the death penalty is maintained, the risk of executing the innocent can never be eliminated. Since 1973 123 US prisoners have been released from death row after evidence emerged of their innocence of the crimes for which they were sentenced to death. There were six such cases in 2004, two in 2005 and one in 2006. Some prisoners had come close to execution after spending many years under sentence of death. Recurring features in their cases include prosecutorial or police misconduct; the use of unreliable witness testimony, physical evidence, or confessions; and inadequate defense representation. Other US prisoners have gone to their deaths despite serious doubts over their guilt. The state of Florida has the highest number of exonerations: 22.

The then Governor of the
US state of Illinois, George Ryan, declared a moratorium on executions in January 2000 which remains in force. His decision followed the exoneration of the 13th death row prisoner found to have been wrongfully convicted in the state since the USA reinstated the death penalty in 1977. During the same period, 12 other Illinois prisoners had been executed. In January 2003 Governor Ryan pardoned four death row prisoners and commuted all 167 other death sentences in Illinois.” 

 

Is it biblical for Christians to continue to support the death penalty in this country when these conditions exist? Recent much publicized examples of wealthy people who have beaten the rap (O.J. Simpson, Phil Spector) only serve to point to the inequities in the system. Wealthy people have access to “dream teams” of attorneys who have virtually unlimited resources to put on a defense.  Poor people bear the brunt of the death penalty because they do not have these kinds of resources.  Prosecutors of such cases are under intense media scrutiny and this pressure can often lead to missteps that might not be made in lower profile cases. These missteps usually help the defense.

 

The Scriptures are replete with passages that teach equity in justice, not taking bribes, not treating people differently because of their perceived status or lack thereof. When the deck is clearly stacked against the “little guy”, how can we continue to support the death penalty in its current form?

 

Imperfect obedience (pretty much the only kind we can offer) is better than none, but the finality of an execution leaves no room for error.  How can Christians continue to support the death penalty while ignoring the issues that lead to its very flawed implementation? Time and again I am reminded of Jesus’ words to the Pharisees: Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint and dill and cummin, and have neglected the weightier provisions of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness; but these are the things you should have done without neglecting the others    Matthew 23:23.

 

We don’t have the luxury of saying that the state should continue to execute people while we work on the other issues – poverty, injustice, inequity, corruption. This is not exalting love over justice or NT over OT, its about being faithful to the whole counsel of God.

 

 


What would the world look like if everyone lived like you?

This thought provoking question was posed on the Marketplace program which I hear on my local NPR station on my way to work everyday. The question had to do with consumerism and an on-line game in which one's lifestyle choices are rated according to some criteria. The level of our consumerism is certainly something to be considered (whether you agree with their criteria or not). This is particularly true for those of us who consider ourselves to be followers of Christ: do my lifestyle choices reflect the command to love my neighbor as myself?

The question led me to consider other aspects of my life. If everyone prayed like I pray, loved their neighbor like I love my neighbor, worked like I work, practiced stewardship like I practice stewardship - what would the church and the world look like?

I for one am thankful that there are people who live life at a higher level in these and many other areas than I do, for I tremble to think what it would be like if my example was the apex.


Journey back in time

Back in August we took a trip out east to visit family. In preparation for the trip I mapped out all of the places that I knew of where my parents and our family lived. In addition, after having found a cousin I didn't know I had, Grace and Kirawe had the location of my great-grandparents and grandmother's grave.

So one day we drove to all of these places and also visited with my uncle - the only surviving member of the family from my parent's generation. At 89 he is still mentally sharp and can recall details of the past that are amazing. For example, during the war (the big one of course) he worked in the Pentagon. His commanding officer was none other than Captain Marvel. Not having been a fan of comic books, the significance of the name in popular culture was lost on him, but he recounted details of occurrences from 60+ years ago as if they had occurred last week.

At the cemetery we located the grave of my ancestors which my long lost cousin had located a few months before. At the time it was overgrown and she had requested that it be maintained, so we were able to find it easily. We stood there a few moments and gave thanks for those intrepid souls who had left their homeland in the 1870's to travel to this land and build a new life. ebling grave

What they went through and what they left behind we know nothing of. Of my great grandmother, we know she came with two sisters. One eventually married and moved to Minnesota and the other was Lutheran deaconness who had come to work with Dr. Lankenau in founding the German Hospital which eventually became Lankenau hospital. They probably never saw their parents again, and perhaps never saw the sister who had moved to Minnesota. They didn't have an easy life. The final resting place of their earthly remains is certainly a nicer location than where they lived their earthly lives.

We drove into Philadelphia to see the place where they lived and where my dad grew up. It is a narrow (one-way) street lined on both sides with row homes. picture 088The street was blocked off - evidently for a block party - and though it was pretty mean (to use an old word), it seemed that there was a sense of community and of people trying to make a go of it.

Our next stop was where my mother grew up. Her parents ran a grocery store and lived above it. Oddly enough, it was still a small grocery store but now Hispanic rather than German. Picture 089It was the lone building on the the block and was in the midst of vacant lots and abandoned buildings, but still a working business. I should have gone in. I don't know what the neighborhood looked like back when my mom lived there in the 30's and 40's -  I should ask my uncle who was a frequent visitor there.

We've had it pretty good, standing on the shoulders of those who have gone before us.


Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Eisagesis

Having received my training at a dispensational school, I am well aware of the thought process that goes into their method of bible interpretation. I tuned in Grant Jeffrey tonight out of curiosity, and I was amazed at the pick and choose method employed in supporting his pre-determined interpretation of prophecy. Pick verses out of context and assert that they apply to the anti-christ.

What was the classic example of eisagesis (reading into the text, as opposed to exegesis, drawing the meaning out of the text) was his interpretation of Revelation 13:11 - "And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth..." Jeffrey asserts that the earth refers to the land of Israel, hence the false prophet is a Jew. The same word appears some 67 times in the book of Revelation. To assert that "earth" refers to the land of Israel in Revelation 13:11 refutes virtually all of the dispensational tribulation theories, for it would then limit the judgments that fall on the "earth" to just the land of Israel. That is pretty much what the preterists claim.

 



Next 5 >>